by Rabbi Dov Fischer, Israel Hayom 

There is good reason that the Arab world and the anti-Israel Left insist on using the mendacious and geographically inaccurate term “West Bank” when they refer to the regions of Judea and Samaria. Think about it.

Imagine a human-rights movement built around a slogan of: Ban Arabs from Arabia! Such a slogan and movement would raise many questions, including but not limited to: Well, where else would Arabs have a right to be if not in Arabia? Who would have a greater claim to Arabia than Arabs?

Although freedom-loving Americans have endless reasons to squirm when contemplating Saudi Arabia, as do freedom-hating Americans, we all tend to agree that Arabs who want to live there have an assumed right to be there. Arabia for Arabs.

India for Indians. Russia for Russians. Mongolia for Mongolians – some outer, some inner. Austria for Austrians. Guatemala for Guatemalans. Cuba for Cubans. Sounds right.

Somewhere along the litany it would make sense to say: Yehuda for Yehudim – i.e., Judea for Jews. Even antisemites would find it hard to build slogans around: “Ban Jews from Judea! Jews Never Lived in Judea!” The Jews (Yehudim in Hebrew) of the tribe of Judah (Yehudah) gave the land of Yehudah (Judea) its name: Judea, as transliterated in the King James Version.

It always has been preposterous to call Judea and Samaria the “West Bank.” Think of the most famous locations in the Bible: Jerusalem, Hebron, Bethlehem, Nazareth, Beth El, Jericho, Shiloh, Shechem (Nablus), Galilee, Tekoa – all the places where the Jewish patriarchs and matriarchs, the kings and prophets walked and lived. Jesus and the Apostles, too. Their lives all centered in Judea and in Samaria. Those terms are all over the Bible, with more than 100 mentions just of “Samaria” in the Tanakh (Jewish Bible) and in the Christian Gospels.

In those days there was no Tel Aviv, no Herzliyah, no Haifa, no Netanya. Sure, the Zionists occupied those lands, too. But it was in the cities of Judea and Samaria that the seeds of Western civilization were planted and took root.

Visit virtually any of the 140 Jewish communities where 800,000 Jews now reside along Judea and Samaria, and you will not see any river bank. It is not like Jersey City, New Jersey, which is on the West Bank of the Hudson River. No one re-names Jersey City “the West Bank.” Why not? Too much history there? Too many Biblical memories of Moses and Aaron buying shoes at Journal Square or using the PATH trains at the Grove Street station?

The Arab world and their Woke allies have no problem calling everywhere else in the Middle East by Biblical names: Beersheba, Galilee, Jordan River, Gaza, Damascus, Lebanon, Tyre, Sidon (Sidon), and of course Jerusalem, Hebron, Bethlehem, and Nazareth. Even Americans comfortably employ those Biblical names for so many cities: Hebron (Maryland), the Jericho Turnpike (NY), Bethel (Indiana), the Battle of Shiloh (Tennessee), Manassas (Menashe) (Virginia). For a Hebron West Bank, there even is Hebron Savings Bank. Want even more of a “west bank”? There is Bank of the West.  Also Community West Bank.

Too west – or you just can’t make up your mind? Well, then how about East West Bank?

Judea and Samaria – Yehuda and Shomron – should be called by their real names and not by the ersatz Woke term that seeks to divest 800,000 Jews now living there of their heritage and of their land. When a newborn child is due to arrive, think of the hours, the contemplating, even the inter-family wrangling and negotiating, that often precede naming the newcomer. Names have great power and meanings. That is why Israel’s enemies call that region “The West Bank.”

And why we should call it Judea and Samaria.

Rabbi Dov Fischer, a law professor and senior rabbinic fellow at the Coalition for Jewish Values, is a senior contributing editor at The American Spectator.