In the News
JTA: Trump’s dinner with a Holocaust denier draws rare criticism from some of his Jewish allies
CJV criticized Trump’s decision to host antisemite Kanye West and Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes at Mar-a-Lago.
JNS: Likud and Itamar Ben-Gvir’s Otzma Yehudit agree to roles in governing coalition
CJV called out the govt. for their double standard against Ben-Gvir while continuing to use taxpayer dollars to fund antisemitic extremists in the PA.
VINNews: WATCH: R’ Yaakov Menken: Kanye not ‘radically different than Farrakhan and Omar’
Rabbi Yaakov Menken discusses Kanye West, Kyrie Irving, Ben Shapiro, and why there’s been a surge in antisemitism.
Townhall: What Christianity Today Got Wrong About the Respect for Marriage Act
Here you have a piece of legislation that exposes every traditional Jewish practitioner of anything to potential litigation.
The Stream: What Christianity Today Got Wrong About the ‘Respect for Marriage Act’
All the “Respect for Marriage” Act does is target people of faith who don’t support woke ideology.
Red State: Leftist Orgs Move Against Musk After Trump Reinstatement, and Elon Has Thoughts
Elon Musk reinstated President Donald Trump’s Twitter account on Saturday night, causing an immediate meltdown from the NAACP and ADL.
Israel Today: Rabbis Call Out American Double Standards on Israel
How are Itamar Ben-Gvir’s actions a “celebration of a terrorist legacy,” but Mahmoud Abbas’ are not?
Post Millennial: Elon Musk to woke ADL boss: ‘Hey stop defaming me’ over Trump reinstatement
Greenblatt has also been criticized by the Coalition for Jewish Values for his and the ADL’s hypocrisy and bias.
Denison Forum: Does the so-called “Respect For Marriage Act” threaten our religious liberty?
Rabbi Yaakov Menken argues that the Respect for Marriage Act will empower bad actors willing to engage in litigation.
JNS: Rabbis call out State Department for double standard on Ben-Gvir and Palestinian terrorism
Attending a memorial for a murder victim is hardly ‘celebrating’ terror; Ben-Gvir carefully said that he did not agree with the deceased’s position.